The Accordionist is a painting done by Pablo Picasso in
1911. The painting is the depiction of a man playing an accordion. This
painting was done in the style of analytic cubism, which Picasso invented
between 1907 and 1914. In this, he took three dimensional shapes and made them
two dimensional. The image is clearly distorted, but uses simple color schemes
to convey the meaning and depth. This type of cubism, analytical cubism, is the
key in the development of modern painting because it gave way to a new form of pictorial
space. Deep perspective is now replaced with shallow perspective. There is no
longer several different elements to catch your attention. As seen in The
Accordionist, you are primarily focused on differentiating the different yet
simple shapes and making out the figure. The use of the brown and tan tones do
not distract or take away from this either.
As seen in Ezra Pounds poems that we looked at in class,
he does not want to distract from the meaning or depth of his works either. As
stated in the essay read for class, Pound was probably the most effected by the
modern art, which was obviously influenced by Cubism. The simplicity of Pounds
words draw attention to the simple meaning he is conveying in his works. In In a Station of the Metro, he writes a
two lined poem that is rhythmic yet simple. He goes between modernism and
nature and intertwines the two. We are meant to understand the meaning between
this and nothing more. Like in The Accordionist, we are meant to understand the
image and nothing more; how the different shapes convey and construct a simple
image.

Can you be more specific in the second paragraph? You mention what Pound's poem does, but how do you see it doing that? Can you cite and then explain how you see that happening?
ReplyDelete