I
was drawn to a particular passage on pages 14-16 that conditioned my reading of
the rest of the novel. The interaction between Mrs. Ramsey and Charles Tansley
in this moment reminded me of last week’s assignment of taking the literary
tools of impressionism and imagism and using the analytical tools on visual
specimens. On page 14, Mrs. Ramsey essentially narrates Tansley’s history back
to him, beginning with noting that he should have been a philosopher and then
chronologically naming the things that had gone wrong. The narrator notes that
at the end of Mrs. Ramsey’s “narrative”, they see Tansley as he is in the
present moment, “and then lying, as they saw him, on the lawn” (14). On page
15, Mrs. Ramsey and Tansley witness a man hanging up an advertisement, which is
given a rudimentary analysis by Mrs. Ramsey, followed by her in-depth analysis
of Tansley’s response to the advertisement and her exclamation. As a response
to the image of the circus, Tansley leaves Mrs. Ramsey all kinds of visual and
audible hints that she then analyzes. Tansley wishes Mrs. Ramsley could “see”
him differently, “gowned and hooded, walking in a procession. A fellowship, a
professorship, he felt capable of anything” (15), but realizes she is looking
at the man hanging the advertisement. When Tansley attempts to copy Mrs. Ramsey’s
excitement about the circus, the narrator describes it as a “clicking” sound,
and suggests that the way he says “Let’s go” is so self-conscious that it makes
Mrs. Ramsey uncomfortable. The narrator remarks later in the paragraph that the
way Tansley says “return hospitality” was “parched” and “stiff”. Aside from
having an “untrained mind” (13), unable to “follow the ugly academic jargon”
(16) that Tansley uses, the narrator gives Mrs. Ramsey the authority to actually
help the reader to come to a compelling analysis of Tansley, by reading him
like fragments of an image, lyrics to a song, and incorporating his history and
contexts.
No comments:
Post a Comment