When I began BLAST I did not except to read a magazine that
placed a nationalistic and an English-centric mindset throughout the pages of the
magazine. BLAST applied the tropes
one constantly encounters in a nationalistic magazine; it constantly references
the nation’s greatest writer; speaks on its greatness and how their country
continue that traditions yet, the “BLAST manifesto” carry out these tropes in
an unoriginal way. It just reiterated its superiority. BLAST claims, “The
Modern world is due almost entirely to the Anglo-Saxon genius-its appearance
and its spirit” (39). I except that the magazine is not only trying to clarify that
they are developing a new ways of letting the world be, however, the English
are specifically can understand the way that everyone in Europe-and soon the
world-should view things. Especially the different subjects, like art, that is supposed
to be mastered by another country, but the English can do it better.
It is strange
and alarming that this sense of nationalism sprung up at the time because it
seems that modern writers constantly maintained and wanted to be disconnected
and alienated from their sense of time and space. The jump from feeling outside
the norms and trying to find their place in the world is very stark from the
Manifestos. It is hard to draw the conclusion that the writers at the time
found their identity by remaining nationalistic, even the American Ezra Pound.
I find it weird that a purposefully and blusterous type of magazine of BLAST
that want to be on another plan from all people relies on nationalism, the most
generic way of expressing oneself to do it.
No comments:
Post a Comment